Walls Are My Worst Habit | MEI Academy

You’ve blocked people, sure—but have you ever noticed how much work it takes to keep them out of your head? The same instincts that build tiny emotional walls in our group chats and family texts are the ones redrawing borders, creating refugees, and keeping whole nations locked in conflict. This piece won’t tell you to “be nicer”; it’s going to ask a far more uncomfortable question: what if the way we fight in our kitchens is quietly teaching our kids how the world decides who belongs—and who doesn’t?

Walls Are My Worst Habit

The Silent Block Button

You don’t need artillery to start a war. These days, all you need with the right amount of power is an inflammatory post on social media.   For most of us, however, it can be as simple as muting, unfollowing, or blocking someone on our social media feeds. These are the private little war-rooms” where we decide, “You don’t get access to me anymore.”

We like to think that “conflict” is something that happens out there—Ukraine, Gaza, Cambodia—on maps and news tickers. But we all know the uncomfortable truth; before borders harden on a map, they harden in people. Our kids are practicing conflict in group chats and hallways every day. So are we—in the family text thread, the high school parents email, the colleague we’ve mentally exiled but still have to “cc” in emails.

Here’s the thing we don’t like to admit: cutting someone out often feels amazing… for about ten minutes. Then the admin work of the wall kicks in. Who’s invited? Who sits where? Who knows what? You become border security for your own life. It’s exhausting.

From Group Chat to Geopolitics

Conflict isn’t just “ideology”; it’s about people, their fears, their scars, and their hopes. Grown‑up version: it’s also about our egos. And that is the tough part; the ego is where we live in our minds.

Looking back at the Khmer Rouge in Cambodia—an entire regime built on the fantasy of “purity,” on deciding who belonged and who didn’t. The same ideology plays out all over our world today, including the same United States that, ironically, funded the Khmer Rouge so that they could eradicate communism from the country that spilled over after the Vietnam War, but that is a whole other story. In Cambodia, it was simple man-defined lines on a map, categories in someone’s head, that turned into mass graves. In Thailand, scientists now study elephant–human conflict because even non‑human neighbours get dragged into our territorial drama when we decide whose needs matter.

We love to believe there’s a clean line between our “little” walls and those world‑shaking ones. There isn’t. The emotional math is identical, where “You hurt me” + “I feel unsafe”+ “I take control” = “I shut you out”. It seems simple, but there is obviously no wiggle room for open-mindedness. But here is where it costs lives: “Our group feels threatened” + “we take control” = “we shut borders, redraw maps, and erase histories”. Do you see the parallels with today’s world news? Yes, it can be THAT easy for everything to unravel like a loose thread on a flag. 

When Protection Becomes Isolation

Some walls are absolutely worth building. If someone is abusive, dangerous, or relentlessly disrespectful, a hard boundary isn’t cruel; it’s survival. We have to ask ourselves, “What is worth fighting for?” This isn’t a combat question; it’s everyday. If it is for safety, dignity, or truth? I say it’s worth it, what about you?

But a lot of the walls we build inside aren’t about safety. They’re about not wanting to be uncomfortable. They’re about never having to say, “I was wrong,” or “You hurt me,” or worst of all, “Can we try again?”

And walls rarely stay local. One cut‑off sibling can quickly become a family fracture. One feud in a friend group becomes separate grad trips, duplicate birthday plans, and kids absorbing the lesson that people are disposable. Internationally, one border dispute becomes a refugee crisis, a destabilized region, and a generation that knows war before they know algebra.

Practicing Peace in the Petri Dish

Here’s the hopeful, slightly infuriating part: if conflict starts in the micro, so does resolution. Therefore, it takes focus and concentration to sort it out; it’s not so obvious what to do. 

If you can choose one hard conversation over an instant block, you’re doing what peace negotiators get flown across the world to attempt. If your teenager can say, “I need space, but I don’t want to erase you,” they’re quietly rewriting the script most adults still follow. If we, as the “grown‑ups”, can model repairing instead of exiling, then “worth fighting for” stops being about defending our walls and starts being about defending our capacity to stay human with each other.

You can’t personally halt a war. Your kid can’t redraw a border. But tonight, in your kitchen, in their group chat, in that email you’re tempted to weaponize, there’s a smaller front line.

If we change how we build and dismantle the walls inside, then maybe our kids inherit a world where conflict is still inevitable—but permanent exile isn’t.